[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: CPU-controlled '88 ur-Quattro WG?
- To: quattro@swiss.ans.net (Non Receipt Notification Requested) (IPM Return Requested)
- Subject: Re: CPU-controlled '88 ur-Quattro WG?
- From: glen.powell@smc.com
- Date: 22 Dec 1994 07:35:42 -0500
- Autoforwarded: FALSE
- Importance: normal
- P1-Content-Type: P2
- P1-Message-Id: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLAN;X400ATT Dec 22 07:35:42 1994
- P1-Recipient: quattro@swiss.ans.net
- Priority: normal
- Reply-To: quattro
- Sender: quattro-owner
- Ua-Content-Id: 423507221294
- X400-Trace: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLANarrival 22 Dec 1994 07:35:42 -0500action Relayed
The ur-Quattro's CPU shutdown of the fool pump when overboost is detected
is unrelated to temperature. However, an actual overboost condition that
could trigger shutdown could be temperature related. In theory, an engine
should be able to build more boost at a given RPM when the ambient temp
is lower. If this additional boost is enough to trigger the overboost
protection, this could possibly cause the cut-out observed at low temps
and high boost.
I disconnected the hoses to the WG on the 5000CSQW to eliminate the
possibility of the CPU changing the boost level for the purpose of
testing different WG springs and also for testing of my modification to
allow external adjustability of the WG, and to set the boost level
without interference by the CPU. After the "static" boost level was
adjusted as high as possible without CPU-shutdown (~1.3 Bar) the hoses
were reconnected.
On a related note, I often observe what feels like a small loss of power
as the boost comes up to max, it feels like the CPU might be reducing the
boost via those WG control hoses, but the "knock" light never comes on. I
may try disconnecting the WG hoses and testing to see if the perceived
power loss might be due to the CPU reducing boost.
-glen