[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: FS:1981 Audi GT Coupe
- To: quattro@swiss.ans.net (Non Receipt Notification Requested) (IPM Return Requested)
- Subject: Re: FS:1981 Audi GT Coupe
- From: glen.powell@smc.com
- Date: 26 Jan 1995 10:25:33 -0500
- Autoforwarded: FALSE
- Importance: normal
- Message-Type: Multiple part
- P1-Content-Type: P2
- P1-Message-Id: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLAN;X400ATT Jan 26 10:25:33 1995
- P1-Recipient: quattro@swiss.ans.net
- Priority: normal
- Reply-To: quattro
- Sender: quattro-owner
- Ua-Content-Id: 322510260195
- X400-Trace: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLANarrival 26 Jan 1995 10:25:33 -0500action Relayed
--------------------------- Begin X.400 Bodypart 1 --------------------------
...yes.....but.....the 5-cylinder has larger displacement and likely has
a much broader torque band, as well as higher peak torque and higher peak
HP. It's really the broader torque curve/output of the 5-cylinder that
would make the 4000Q a better performer Vs a stock 4000s 4-cylinder, not
the (10-15?) higher peak HP figure, IMFO.
.....sure wish I had an old copy of that AudiWatch Performance Matrix
with the actual HP and torque figures.....as well as 1/4 mile times,
weight, HP/weight, etc.....it would be a most interesting exercise to
compare the area under the torque curves for the two engines.....
Also, I don't know what the 4000s has for gears, but the '84 4000Q has
4.11:1 diffs and very low, close-ratio transmission gearing. 4000 RPM at
a mere 80 MPH makes for excellent acceleration, passing power and
throttle response.
-glen
========== On Wed, 25 Jan 1995 - quattro-owner wrote: ==========
--------------------------- Begin X.400 Bodypart 2 --------------------------
On 25 Jan 1995 glen.powell@smc.com wrote:
> Is not the additional HP of the 5-cylinder with the OEM header (unlike
> the Coupe GT's 5-cylinder) enough to overcome the weight penalty of the
> 4000Q Vs the 4000s? I'd be real surprised if a stock 4000s would out
> accelerate or have a higher top-end Vs a stock 4000Q.....
>
> Anyone still have a copy of the "Audi Performance Matrix" that listed HP,
> weights, 1/4 mile times, etc?
I must admit, I am dealing with purely "seat of the pants" evaluations,
but my pants said that the reduced weight coupled with hp numbers that
are almost identical (+ - 10, 15hp), the S would out accelerate the q any
day. The top end of the q would certainly be better though. The S is
geared pretty low (85-87 models w/close ratio), but it gets there pretty
well. I have acheived a top speed of around 110-115, but don't have a
lot of stright stretches. I don't have much more room on my license for
points either...
---Bob
---87 4000S, 1.8L
P.S. Anyone have graphs of the output at various rpm's for the -5? The
1.8L-4 would be pretty easy to obtain baseline figures, as it is VERY
similar to a GTi motor.
----------------------------- End X.400 Bodyparts ----------------------------