[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: DOT 3,4,5?
- To: quattro@coimbra.ans.net (Non Receipt Notification Requested) (IPM Return Requested)
- Subject: Re: DOT 3,4,5?
- From: glen.powell@smc.com
- Date: 23 Aug 1995 15:20:52 -0400
- Autoforwarded: FALSE
- Importance: normal
- P1-Content-Type: P2
- P1-Message-Id: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLAN;X400ATT Aug 23 15:20:52 1995
- P1-Recipient: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
- Priority: normal
- Sender: quattro-owner@coimbra.ans.net
- Ua-Content-Id: 522015230895
- X400-Trace: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLANarrival 23 Aug 1995 15:20:52 -0400action Relayed
You may be right about DOT 5 being resistant to water
absorbtion..... I do seem to remember reading that DOT 5
should never be used in systems designed for DOT 3 or 4,
something about eating seals or requiring total flush and
elimination of any DOT 3/4 residue prior to installing the 5.
Someone out here with more track experience must know
this stuff by heart.....
-glen