[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: ur-Q strut brace

To: glen.powell@smc.com
Subject: Re: ur-Q strut brace
From: "Graydon D. Stuckey" <graydon@apollo.gmi.edu>
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 1995 08:38:14 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Non Receipt Notification Requested <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
In-Reply-To: <535808070995*/PN=glen.powell/OU=notes/PRMD=smclan/ADMD=attmail/C=us/@open400.smc.com>
Sender: quattro-owner@coimbra.ans.net

On 7 Sep 1995 glen.powell@smc.com wrote:

>   if there were really a benefit to adding a strut
>   brace to the ur-Q that these guys would have
>   done it.....these cars are pretty stiff, no at all
Glen,

	I agree, many Pro Rally cars with there EXTENSIVE cages prolly 
don't require a strut brace.

Later,									
Graydon D. Stuckey								
graydon@apollo.gmi.edu								
'86 Audi 5000 CS Turbo Quattro, GDS Racing Stage II
'83 Mazda RX7 w/13B, GDS Racing Stage 58474

References:
- Re: ur-Q strut brace
  - From: glen.powell@smc.com

Prev by Author: Re: Undeliverable Message
Next by Author: Re: Fog lights
Prev by thread: Re: ur-Q strut brace
Next by thread: Re: ur-Q strut brace
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread