[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: 88,89 imsa cars

To: eliot@u.washington.edu
Subject: Re: 88,89 imsa cars
From: STEADIRIC@aol.com
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 1995 13:37:30 -0500
cc: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
Sender: quattro-owner@coimbra.ans.net

>looks like your buzzer or its operator is defective, eric... :)

Don't think so Elliott.  The Tub as Jeff pointed out was just a Roof, 
Floor and A,B,C Pillars other than that it was a "Ship in a bottle" Roll 
cage, and a Kevlar, Alluminum body.  As for the Torque split it changed 
from track to track.  This info came from Hurley Haywood and Hans 
Stuck.... They would know.


Later!

Eric Fletcher
'87 5KCSTQIA2RSR2B

STEADI RIC@aol.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 88,89 imsa cars
  - From: Eliot Lim <eliot@u.washington.edu>

Prev by Author: Re: 89-90 200q (5000tq also?) 0-60 times?
Next by Author: Re: 88,89 imsa cars
Prev by thread: Re: 88,89 imsa cars
Next by thread: Re: 88,89 imsa cars
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread