[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question on 90 100s timing belt??

To: JRUSSE51@MAINE.MAINE.EDU (John Russell)
Subject: Re: Question on 90 100s timing belt??
From: Andrew Duane USG/PE <duane@zk3.dec.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 1996 08:55:49 -0500 (EDT)
Cc: quattro@coimbra.ans.net (Quattro List)
In-Reply-To: <JRUSSE51.960604081019@maine.maine.EDU> from "John Russell" at Jun 4, 96 08:10:19 am
Reply-To: duane@zk3.dec.com
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

Hairy green toads from Mars made John Russell say:

> IS this the 2.2 that needs a new timing belt at 60k? I might have missed the
> letters on timing belts and don't have (can't afford) the acces to the archives

The 2.3 liter 10V engine is non-interference. My '89 100Q, for example.
No real need for a new timing belt. Mine has 125K and is fine

The 20V is an interference engine: broken belt == broken valves.
Gotta replace Angela's sometime soon....

-- 

Andrew L. Duane (JOT-7)			duane@zk3.dec.com
Digital Equipment Corporation		(603)-881-1294
110 Spit Brook Road			http://www.zk3.dec.com/~duane
M/S ZKO3-3/U14
Nashua, NH    03062-2698

Only my cat shares my opinions, and she's too heavy to care.

References:
- Question on 90 100s timing belt??
  - From: JRUSSE51@MAINE.MAINE.EDU (John Russell)

Prev by Author: Hood release goes "snap"
Next by Author: Re: 84 brakes
Prev by thread: Question on 90 100s timing belt??
Next by thread: RE: Question on 90 100s timing belt??
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread