[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Normal boost/vacuum readings

To: Robert Myers <rmyers@wvit.wvnet.edu>
Subject: Re: Normal boost/vacuum readings
From: Michael Spiers <mikes@specnet.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 14:09:58 -0400
Cc: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
In-Reply-To: Robert Myers <rmyers@wvit.wvnet.edu> "Re: Normal boost/vacuum readings" (Jun 14, 2:05pm)
References: <9606141805.AA10428@wvit.wvnet.edu>
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

> And probably none of you is getting an accurate reading.  Those in-dash
> gauges are notoriously inaccurate.
>
I am plaberghasted by the blatant blasphemy of our brother Bob!!  Bob, are you
suggesting that Audi electronics are anything less than perfection?  May the
Audi Gods have mercy on your soul-

-- 
-Mike
mikes@specnet.com
mks107@psuvm.psu.edu
87 5000CS TQ - Metropolitan Washington, D.C. (but not for long...)
84 5000S - Boulder, Colorado
90 80 - Bethesda, Maryland
(hunting for the elusive Lago Blue '91 200Q)

References:
- Re: Normal boost/vacuum readings
  - From: Robert Myers <rmyers@wvit.wvnet.edu>

Prev by Author: Re: Normal boost/vacuum readings
Next by Author: Alignment Questions
Prev by thread: Re: Normal boost/vacuum readings
Next by thread: Re: Normal boost/vacuum readings
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread