[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

visionaries



In message <970118154603_1691602321@emout11.mail.aol.com> QSHIPQ@aol.com writes:

> In a message dated 97-01-18 15:27:42 EST, you write:
 
>>I have been reading continuously from all of you "high wattage fans" and do
>>not yet understand this infatuation with high watt bulbs, the effectiveness
>>of the light in much more connected to the >SHAPE< of the prism and it's
>>>LOCATIO< than it is to high wattage, you are not improving the light (by
>>much), you are mostly causing discomfort to other drivers on the road
>>(using those ungodly powerful bulbs!!!!!), regardless of how well you
>>lights are aimed!!!!!!!!!!!

> Phil and Erics comments aside, the above post is CORRECT in it's argument...

I don't see why my comment needs to be laid aside, unless you didn't really 
read what I said:
 
+ Yes and no.  We're not talking about "no expense, effort and appearance
+ spared" rallying or racing systems.  If you're into forest roads and
+ closed circuits and you don't care what the car looks like - I
+ absolutely agree with you.  You never see rally cars fitted with high
+ power bulbs in stock lights.

That, I believe, does concede the essential points about geometry and 
positioning.  For about the eighth time, I'm discussing a compromise which
you are ruling out of court because you don't have the faintest idea what 
I'm talking about - your posts (bilateral symmetry in particular) clearly 
demonstrate that you have no experience of the type of Euro light fitted to my 
car.  

--
 Phil Payne

 Phone: +44 385302803  Fax: +44 1536723021  CIS: 100012,1660



--
 Phil Payne
 phil@sievers.com
 Committee Member, UK Audi [ur-]quattro Owners Club