[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: williams Ruling?

To: "Bob D'Amato" <mx@snet.com>, quattro list <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
Subject: Re: williams Ruling?
From: Dave Eaton <dave.eaton@minedu.govt.nz>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 1997 11:05:50 +0012
Autoforwarded: false
Disclose-Recipients: prohibited
Hop-Count: 1
Importance: normal
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.90.970123164638.19814B-100000@mamie.snet.com>
Mr-Received: by mta MOEMR0.MUAS; Relayed; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 11:05:50 +0012
Mr-Received: by mta CSAV10; Relayed; Fri, 24 Jan 1997 11:05:52 +0012
Priority: normal
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net
Ua-Content-Id: 11B1C2C53200
X400-Mts-Identifier: [;8650051124011997/A74935/CSAV10]

nope, it's on the 20th feb...

..>On Fri, 24 Jan 1997, Dave Eaton wrote:
..>
..>> bob,
..>> 
..>> the trial is scheduled for early next month.
..>> 
..>
..>?? I read the trial was the 20th of Jan...
..>

References:
- Re: williams Ruling?
  - From: "Bob D'Amato" <mx@snet.com>

Prev by Author: Re: williams Ruling?
Next by Author: Re: MB vs RR
Prev by thread: Re: williams Ruling?
Next by thread: David Conner please reply
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread