Re: MB vs RR

[Dave Eaton <dave.eaton@minedu.govt.nz>]

no contest for me.

smoother motor, more power, more low down torque and better gearing, revised
suspension to further decrease understeer, better brakes and lower miles on the
car you purchase.  oh and lower maintenance costs....

-dave
'93 s2
'90 ur-q

..>From: quk@sievers.com (Phil Payne)
..>Date: Sat, 25 Jan 1997 19:10:09 GMT
..>
..>In message <Pine.SUN.3.91.970125171626.1488A-100000@marjoram.compnews.co.uk> Mike writes:
..>
..>> If you sit and drive/ride in both cars, it is easy to notice that the 20V 
..>> is the faster car, so the only place you are going to keep up with a 20V 
..>> in a 10V is on a twisty road with not many straights?
..>
..>Perhaps.  147kw fights 162kw - a bit uneven?  The torque picture is not so 
..>uneven, but is 10% more power worth 60% more money?  The engine (and the 
..>ventilated rear discs) is about the only difference.  Would you want an engine 
..>that makes you remove the inlet manifold to get to the distributor?
..>