[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: AWD v. The Others
On 19 Jan 97 at 9:00, Doug Miller, in part, wrote:
> The advantages on the street would go to AWD due to the ability to cope
> with a wider variety of situations at a higher throttle setting without
> upsetting the vehicle's balance.
And I have my own anecdotal evidence: Near where I live, there's a
marvelous L-R-L sequence, snaking up a hill in less than 200 yards. The
asphalt is in vile shape, with lots of holes & patches where it vanishes
into the gravel shoulder. My wife's former Z-28 (she now has an AWD turbo
Talon) would dance all over the place (more or less predictably), skipping
from bump to bump. My ur-Quattro & my present Galant VR4 gave the feeling
of digging in, grabbing hold, leaping forward, totally under control, and
the only thing limiting the rate of knots uphill was responsibility - the
whole right side of the road being lined with houses. Late at night, with
someone to run interference, I've run this route at a shocking rate of
speed, and AWD just gets more stable.
Similarly, when the first big snow falls, I would take the Z-28 to the
nearest large & vacant parking lot & practice doing doughnuts. Ever try
to do a doughnut with AWD? VERY hard, requires serious throttle & wheel
brutality, usually not very good doughnuts, either, as control returns too
damned fast. Nevertheless, I go out each winter & do my duty....
The viscous diff on the Galant's AWD takes a noticeable amount of time to
warm up & to lock up. My ur-Quattro had a better front-to-rear balance.
Anybody got a comparison on this stunt with a Torsen?
Gene R. Rankin / Madison, WI / USA