[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Speeding?

On Feb 3,  3:51pm, Alexei M Voloshin wrote:
> Subject: Re: Speeding?
> It doesn't matter which way it goes. Just the fact that reading was 
> inaccurate is enough.

ummmm.... enough for *what*?  This argument is worthless.  It's not
an argument that is germane only to laser; radar suffers the same
flaws of trigonometry, and if you win a speeding case based on this
argument, it will set a precedent that'll toss out *all* laser *and*
radar tickets ever issued in the US.  Nice dream.  Ain't gonna
happen.

Dan Masi
'96 A4Q

> Alex
> 
> On Mon, 3 Feb 1997, Robert Myers wrote:
> 
> > At 04:27 PM 2/3/97 -0500, you wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >Lazer guns are harder to defeat that microwave guns, however there are a 
> > >few arguments:
> > 
> > ---snip---
> > 
> > >- If he was to the side of the rode, due to the geometry of the 
> > >situation, his reading has to be off and that makes it inaccurate. 
> > 
> > But the inaccuracy is in *your* favor.  In this instance, his reading will
> > be low, not high.  Don't go near this particular argument.