Re: US Audis - timing of safety features

["Sean Ford" <sean@nwh.org>]

I've read of the '91's crashworthiness, I believe, on the NTHSA page, is
this also true of the '92 100? It would seem funny to me that a newer model
would give up something in the crashworthiness area to an older model?

Sean Ford
sean@nwh.org
Newton-Wellesley Hospital
Newton, MA  02162 (USA)
'92 Audi 100CS 5spd  16K miles (and counting!)
'89 Suzuki Katana 600 14K miles (and hibernating)

----------
> From: JS Taylor <jstaylor@ix.netcom.com>
> To: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
> Subject: US Audis - timing of safety features
> Date: Friday, March 07, 1997 4:16 PM
> rather have the pretensioners than an airbag.  BTW the 91 100 set the 
> standard for crash test results that I don't think has been surpassed to 
> date.
> 
> HTH
>    John Taylor