Re: 91 200tq for sale

[kerry griffith <kerry.griffith@m.k12.ut.us>]

SOP8920@Siena.edu wrote:
> 
> Chris wrote:

> I've been told that 20v wagons are very rare. I've seen a few debates
> on the list about which 200 is the better car to buy, the 10v or 20v.
> The consensus, it seemed to me, was that a low mileage 10v was a better option
> because the much lower cost would enable a new owner to invest in some
> performance modifications.

One of the things I disliked about my Ur-Q was the turbo 
lag. My 20v is much more V8-like in terms of low end 
torque. For that reason I recommend the 20v. Also, but 
less importantly, I believe the newer the better. 
To get about the hp of the 91 200, one doesn't have to 
spend much on a 10v. After ECU mods, things become 
much more expensive. IMO, buy a 20v if you can afford it. 
The 91 in question sounds like it could be a great car- but 
I would push for the service records. They are easily 
available on the dealer's computer files.
	BTW, kudos to Mr. Parvez for being so helpful.

Kerry
91 200q w/low end torque
89 90q