Seems like a lotta 86-89 5000 - 100/200 problems?

["Sean Ford" <sean@nwh.org>]

Now that I've been on the list for about a month, I've noticed an
inordinate amount of problems cropping up for the 86-89 5000/100/200
sedans. This is such a general question, but is this due to the age and
mileage of the vehicles, or was it just that body style that represented
less than optimal build quality and reliability?

This is probably just my paranoia kicking in again, but I'm trying to stare
into the crystal ball for my car down the road...

Sean Ford
sean@nwh.org
Newton-Wellesley Hospital
Newton, MA  02162 (USA)
'92 Audi 100CS 5spd  17K miles (and counting!)
'89 Suzuki Katana 600 14K miles (and hibernating)