[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
to: 5000 anti-roll bar respondants
- To: <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
- Subject: to: 5000 anti-roll bar respondants
- From: brv@chrysler.com
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 14:17:14 -0500
- Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 (22)
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [/PRMD=CHRYSLER/ADMD=IBMX400/C=US/;0041200001955895000002]
- X400-Originator: brv@mailhub.is.chrysler.com
- X400-Recipients: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
Guys,
I've received plenty of responses regarding the pursuit of building
some bars for the 5K. Many of you have added some thoughts which I
have found very insightful. Let me elaborate on what has been
mentioned:
Many of you have expressed concern about increasing the understeer
balance inherent in the stock setup . I certainly agree. The
addition of a bigger front bar without a rear bar MAY increase
understeer. Many times with a Macphearson strut front suspension the
camber change due to body roll is very significant and the resulting
change in tire contact patch decreases grip. Sometimes limiting the
body roll with an appropriate sized bar in front will DECREASE
understeer because the amount of camber change is reduced. The plus
of better tire contact outweighs the negative of increased lateral
weight transfer. This may or may not be the case with our cars.
A rear bar might also be a reasonable solution. This obviously
requires more engineering due to the mounting requirements. Increased
rear roll stiffness would shift the balance in the desired direction
and also help control camber change. Any thought on mounting would be
greatly appreciated.
And, of course, two bars engineered together would be awesome. We'll
see how this goes.
If you read ADDCO's catalog, you will see many cars that use the
swaybar as a suspension locating device. In many of these
applications, they just add a second non-locating bar to the front so
that they don't need to figure out how to build an OEM variety. I
still haven't gotten specific with them so I still don't know what
they would want to do.
Costwise, I'm guessing well under $200 per bar. Please don't lynch me
if it is not. That's the price I would be willing to pay.
What I was hoping to do to design this setup was to model the
Quattro's suspension using Bill Mitchel's software here at work. (I
need to learn a few more tricks anyway and we have many people who can
help me through it). What this process requires is accurate data on
suspension parameters such as camber curves, toe curves, spring rates,
arm lengths, roll centers, roll axis, center of gravity, bushings
etc... I am willing to measure some of this myself but I was hoping
someone out there (Eric F.??) may have done some of this already. My
car is lowered w/ H&R 's so my data will not correlate with the
majority of you who reponded. If anyone has some of this or knows
where to get it, please tell me! Otherwise, anything we do will be a
trial and error SWAG.
I'm sorry I don't have the time to respond to everyone personally at
the moment so I hope I will continue to hear from people interested in
the project. Perhaps we might want to start sharing concepts on the
list so everyone can get an idea of what we are trying to do.
I'll be offline (Easter at the parents house in Scranton, Pa.)until
Tuesday so don't panic if I don't respond for a few days.
Keep those ideas coming!!
Brian Vinson
86 5KCSTQ "looking for that magic state of neutral handling"