>In message <970404034017_1054761781@emout17.mail.aol.com> ScharfR@aol.com writes: >> And in continuing this useless thread, why don't we start in on the fire >> pumper engine that made good? and quk@sievers.com (Phil Payne) replied >Someone's already tried that. These threads don't usually end in a climax, >though. ...and we should send you to Coventry for making such an awful joke?