Re: Dynosaurus Rx

["Randall C. Markarian" <asenna@accessus.net>]

QSHIPQ@aol.com wrote:
> Where is the inconsistancy
> specifically Randall.  Open diff, reread that, open diff, reread that, open
> diff.   I appreciate the fact you find my posts so interesting, but I really
> don't see anything inconsistant with the post above on the TRACK vs my post
> on a 2 wheel dyno.
> 
> And again, without the spam, I ask that you post an informative post for
> every one you use to spam me.  You are down a couple in that respect.  We
> won't forget that either. Now, I have put up a post, an informative one,
> regarding the use of 2 wheeled dynos for a quattro hp evaluation ONLY.
>  Randall, you want to translate that to the track.  Won't jump there with you
> sir.  It's in the owners manual (and the car isn't moving Randall), so many
> shops are willing to do the procedure when you can show them the
> manufacturers documentation.  The point is getting lost in the muck some
> here.
> 
Scott,

Here is a question.  If one were to test AWD v RWD v FWD, then a "test
bed" of some sort must be devised.  This test bed should be able to
switch among the three configs.  Therefore, if one could take a car, any
car, that could by some "means" be able to deliver power to the ground
in any of these three configurations would be suitable.  One would
surmise that if you could dyno the car, an AWD car, with just two of the
wheels, and get some meaningful info from this, then driving that car on
a road, or track, would yield meaningful info on that AWD/RWD/FWD
question that was previously asked.

Sorry that it took so long to inform you, I was out of town.

Adios

-- 

Randall C. Markarian

1990 V8 Quattro
1996 Merc E320

Saint Louis, Missouri