Re: 88 90q vs 4kq differences?

[Kwattro@aol.com]

In a message dated 97-09-26 21:02:03 EDT, you write:

> 110hp in 4k (except '87 1/2 which had NG)
115, 110 is the coupe.
that 15 hp barely makes up for the weight.
>- Headlights suck even worse than stock 4k
Hard, very hard to believe.
>- Center diff is Torsen, so you can only lock rear diff (good or bad
>depending on who you talk to)
IE you can't dyno the car, unlike it's much better predicessor...
>- BBS lace-wheels (14x6) standard on all but very early '88's
Cheap to buy, not as "racy looking."
>- Looks better, in my opinion.
In your opinion.  In my opinion, upside down bathtub.
>- Procon Ten seatbelt tightening feature (I like this better than airbags)
If you're gonna go out, go out in style.  I prefer to crash through the
windsheild.
>- More options available (ABS, electric/memory seats, headlight washers,
>etc.)
More weight in the corners.  More stuff to break.  Expensive stuff.
>- Costs more to buy than 4k, however
Indeed.
>- Upscale interior (wood, leather, better materials, etc.)
Again, all that stuff is on the Do you really need it list.
>
Course, I'm baised, too.  4000's will make it around a track faster, though.
 

Carter J
Kwattro@coimbra.ans.net