[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Low Beam - CRUD????

To: Mike_Rosoft@classic.msn.com (Mark Pickering)
Subject: Re: Low Beam - CRUD????
From: Andrew Duane USG/PE <duane@zk3.dec.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 07:49:38 -0500 (EST)
Cc: quattro@coimbra.ans.net (Quattro List)
In-Reply-To: <UPMAIL06.199711200859340556@classic.msn.com> from "Mark Pickering" at Nov 20, 97 08:36:03 am
Reply-To: duane@zk3.dec.com
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

Hairy green toads from Mars made Mark Pickering say:

> I know that something is missing as my low beam lights are nowhere 
> near as good as my friends 100?

Wow, that's gotta be a first.

Saying someone has a 100 with *better* headlights.
I can only guess that turning on your headlights actively absorbs
light from the surrounding area. :-)

I've replaced my 100's lights with Euro. There's not much you
can do to improve the stock 100/200 lights that much. A nip and
a tuck, sure, but not wholesale improvement.

-- 

Andrew L. Duane (JOT-7)			duane@zk3.dec.com
Digital Equipment Corporation		(603)-884-1294
110 Spit Brook Road
M/S ZKO3-3/U14
Nashua, NH    03062-2698

Only my cat shares my opinions, and she's too heavy to care.

References:
- Low Beam - CRUD????
  - From: "Mark Pickering" <Mike_Rosoft@classic.msn.com>

Prev by Author: A couple'o'things
Next by Author: Re: Narcoleptic coolant temp gauge
Prev by thread: Low Beam - CRUD????
Next by thread: RE: Low Beam - CRUD????
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread