[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: synthetics (consumption)

To: quattro group <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
Subject: Re: synthetics (consumption)
From: Huw Powell <human@nh.ultranet.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 1998 21:45:27 -0500
References: <34A90015.3E6C419F@novagate.com> <34A93F9E.F84C687D@erols.com> <34A929AD.8548BDEE@novagate.com> <34A98A80.99A4E97A@erols.com> <34B13EE2.7C09EBC7@novagate.com> <34B2C25E.DED73DA4@erols.com> <34B2C585.A0669A94@novagate.com> <34B4053F.6C576353@erols.com> <34B50402.C58032F7@novagate.com>
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

> Right. Synth allows that leakage by removing old deposits.

If it's so wonderful to have dino deposits where the oil might leak,
what about its deposits elsewhere in the system?  Are they desireable? 
Or just invisible?  Or does the oil "know" where to deposit to be useful
and only do it there?  Hmmmm

BTW my coupe eats about 1 qt/3000 milesof Syntec, just like the last
engine in it.  Valve seals in my future?  Someday I guess.  When I
change the camshaft...

-- 
Huw Powell

References:
- Re: synthetics
  - From: John Graham <jgraham1@erols.com>
- Re: synthetics (long)
  - From: Sargent Schutt <sargent@novagate.com>
- Re: synthetics (long)
  - From: John Graham <jgraham1@erols.com>
- Re: synthetics (changeover consumption)
  - From: Sargent Schutt <sargent@novagate.com>

Prev by Author: Re: Kang family purchase and impending flame war
Next by Author: Re: Who needs them? I'd rather downshift! (93 90CS brakes)
Prev by thread: Re: synthetics (changeover consumption)
Next by thread: Re: synthetics (changeover consumption)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread