[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Who needs them? I'd rather downshift! (93 90CS brakes)

To: quattro group <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
Subject: Re: Who needs them? I'd rather downshift! (93 90CS brakes)
From: Huw Powell <human@nh.ultranet.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 1998 21:48:09 -0500
References: <34B52995.7B1A2F02@abraxis.com>
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

> Oh yea, also they're charging over $150 EACH for rear rotors and over
> $200 EACH for the fronts.  ("OK, pads and rotors front and back, that
> will be $830."  "Gasp wheeze gasp choke... huh?")

And my theory was that braking was better because brakes were cheaper to
replace than clutches.... Priced your clutch job yet?

-- 
Huw Powell

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Who needs them? I'd rather downshift! (93 90CS brakes)
  - From: John Graham <jgraham1@erols.com>

References:
- Who needs them? I'd rather downshift! (93 90CS brakes)
  - From: Elliott Potter <epotter@abraxis.com>

Prev by Author: Re: synthetics (consumption)
Next by Author: Re: Curiosity.....hi mileage..(+oil)
Prev by thread: Re: Who needs them? I'd rather downshift! (93 90CS brakes)
Next by thread: Re: Who needs them? I'd rather downshift! (93 90CS brakes)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread