[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
What's the diff? torsen tech...
In message <c=NZ%a=_%p=CLANDNZ%l=CLWLG01-980225212130Z-4957@clwlg01.computerland.co.nz> David Eaton writes:
> i've had another think about this issue. this is not a manhood thing,
> but i've certainly overcooked my ur-quattro and learned the hard way
> about how to treat it. i imagine that phil is the same. we both
> haven't been bitten. not trying hard enough? fair enough, but i don't
> think so.
I come home regularly via the A14/A509. Late at night. It's three lanes
wide. I hit the end of the 'off' ramp at around sixty, and power into the
apex. For fun, I sometimes try and stay in the inside lane. Otherwise, I've
got two to drift into. Obviously, I don't do any of this if there's anyone
else around. But I _regularly_ go round that system right on the limit. This
isn't to be confused with the abilities of a racing driver, who can probably
take _any_ bend at close to the limit on sight, relying on reactions. I _know_
this bend, and play around on it on occasions. I've no idea what 'TORSEN
hunting' means. I've never noticed any phenomenon that the term could
describe.
> also no-one in the us has yet had experience of a torsen ur-quattro to
> directly compare. hey you know where i live ;-)
Same invitation applies.
> 3rd data point is the use of the circuit versus the road. my 'rr' has
> had little circuit time (thank you walter) and didn't 'bite', but scott
> has spent much more circuit time, with more highly 'tweaked' cars than i
> (or phil) have.
Mine is absolutely stock.
> 4th data point is that there is a lack of understanding about the
> details of the torsen operation (relative slip to distribute torque, the
> speed of the diff to go from one extreme to another etc), which is
> clouding the issue.
Very much so. The general descriptions of TORSEN (thank you whoever put that
page up) suggest it is highly customisable. What did Audi do to it?
--
Phil Payne
UK Audi [ur-]quattro Owners Club