[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: Q45 vs. 200
Come on guys. I know you all have more sense than this. I obviously can
not have tested all Jap cars. This is only common sense. You and most have
read it as of the cars I've tested. Simple common sense. That's it.
**************************************************************************************************************************************************
*Steve Sachelle Babbar
*'84 5ksT 1.6-2.0 bar <SBABBAR@IRIS.NYIT.EDU>
*Cockpit adjustable wastegate, AudiSport badge
*
*Disclaimer:"Any information contained herein is based purely on my own
*personal experience and may not necessarily reflect yours. Use caution as
*your results may vary from mine."
********************************************************************************
On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, Bruce Aukerman wrote:
> >>>all japanese cars have failed<<<
>
> As was pointed out, try the 300z. Or, how about the last generation
> RX7t, Supra t, [or either of those in NA form], sc400, NSX [little
> pricey, agreed], gsr, etc. Plethora of fun Japanese cars, but, they
> don't have the old Audi quirks, I admit.
>
>
- References:
- Q45 vs. 200
- From: Bruce Aukerman <BRUCE@mannlawfirm.com>