[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: New stupid question: bodywork between early 200 and A6 types...

To: phil@isham-research.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: New stupid question: bodywork between early 200 and A6 types...
From: harrison <hsapir@multiverse.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 1998 00:16:44 -0500
CC: gerard@poboxes.com, quattro@coimbra.ans.net
References: <3985@isham-research.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

Any idea if one would be able to fit?

harrison

Phil Payne wrote:

> In message <35104D2B.99ABFFE5@poboxes.com> Gerard writes:
>
> > Anyone have a type-44 (200/5kT) with a large front bumper/spoiler
> > that incorporates a longer-than-stock intercooler?
>
> In general, I think ur-quattro owners are rather jealous of the stock Type 44
> intercooler.  It's much better placed and larger that ours.
>
> --
>  Phil Payne
>  UK Audi [ur-]quattro Owners Club

References:
- New stupid question: bodywork between early 200 and A6 types...
  - From: quk@isham-research.demon.co.uk (Phil Payne)

Prev by Author: Re: Intercooler Trivia, Stock intercooler good for 1.8 bar?
Next by Author: Re: Roof lining on 5k/200...
Prev by thread: Re: New stupid question: bodywork between early 200 and A6 types...
Next by thread: Roof lining on 5k/200...
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread