Re: Reviewing the reviewers...(minor Q content)

["Graydon D. Stuckey" <graydon@apollo.kettering.edu>]

On Sun, 5 Apr 1998, Matt & Jenai wrote:

> *pretty fast* - I don't think there are very many Q's that run those types

Haha, I know lotsa of guys that would say "That's not fast - I'll show you 
fast!"  :-)   To them, 10s is fast.

> things.  I need layman/subjective commentary (advanced suspension means
> little to me - it seems Corvettes have advanced everything yet they don't

OOOOOohhhhhh that new Corvette is awesome!   Say what you want about the 
styling, the car is flat awesome!

> pull my trigger if you know what I mean).  Does the SC handle well compared
> to a type 44?  Is there that *feel* that German cars tend to have?  Or, is
> the car fast and numb compared to an Audi.  Just wondering...

The 5KCSTQ has a slightly lighter feel to it, but it is deceiving because 
the T-Bird (mine at least with its suspension mods) will corner harder, 
and turn quicker and it will hold through a bumpy turn at least as well 
as my 5KCSTQ.   The type 44 front suspension ought to be wrapped in a 
diaper.  The T-Bird has plenty of very good feedback in the steering 
wheel.   Oh yeah, the T-Bird also has decent brakes. Its _only_ fault is 
its excess weight, so it isn't terribly efficient.   Well that's enough - 
this isn't the SC-list.

Later,--------------------------- -   -   -   -
Graydon D. Stuckey		 / \ / \ / \ / \
graydon@apollo.kettering.edu	|Mr. Muffler... |
810 733 0255			 \ / \ / \ / \ /
--------------------------------- -   -   -   -