Re: compare this what?

[Michael Williams <daserde@ucla.edu>]

QSHIPQ decided to speak these words:

>I'm not with you on this one.  Apples is Apples, when one is genetically
>disposed to performance, the mutants better get some restructure.


My point is that no 4000 lb sedan, no matter the weight distribution, or 
what not is going to be able to actually PERFORM.  Yeah, perhaps it can 
do a 0-60 time in the 6 second range, maybe it can corner, but lets be 
serious here.  Why would you want to have a car that heavy if you are 
looking for performance...that makes no sense.  So what if it is apples 
to apples, if the apples are luxurious apples grown to be extra tasty and 
crunchy, why compare them based on color or luster.  It doesnt make sense 
does it?  Why compare luxury sedans based on performance?  They are 
inherently SUPPOSED to have supple rides, isolated cabins, quiet, 
comfortable.  If a car is more sporty in nature, some of the luxury is 
removed.  Look at the Mercedes.  The S is a very large car and is not a 
performer by any means, however it is considered by many to be THE 
standard in luxury cars.  Why? Because it has a soft ride, comfortable 
seats, is quiet...those are the reasons these cars are made, not to do 
mountain twisties or the slalom at 65 mph.



later...


Michael Sheridan Williams

My new one: 1985 4000 S Quattro
175,000+ miles, and going like a new car
Well, went like a new car.....right into a guard rail :o(

http://members.aol.com/daserde2