[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Torsen ur-q Vs Type 44?

To: "'QSHIPQ'" <QSHIPQ@aol.com>, "quk@isham-research.demon.co.uk" <quk@isham-research.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Torsen ur-q Vs Type 44?
From: quattro <quattro@acacianet.com>
Date: Wed, 6 May 1998 12:38:40 -0400
Cc: "quattro@coimbra.ans.net" <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

I am pretty sure that I can detect some differences in chassis dynamics between the two...

Is it possible that the lower weight, smaller wheelbase, lower polar moment, lower CG and overall stiffer and better suspension of the ur-q Vs the Big Pig (tm) might allow those nasty spider effects to me 100% masked and/or totally corrected for by the ur-q driver? 

-glen

<< I _DO_ wish you'd qualify this as "torsens in Type 44s".  It doesn't
 >>happen in the ur-quattro - you've been told this dozens of times now.
<snip>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Torsen ur-q Vs Type 44?
  - From: Orin Eman <orin@wolfenet.com>

Prev by Author: RE: 4k ventilation system
Next by Author: RE: 1998 a4 understeers
Prev by thread: It's official! (was: Chrysler & Diamler in merger talks?!)
Next by thread: Re: Torsen ur-q Vs Type 44?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread