Re: Prenuptual agreements

[QSHIPQ@aol.com]

In a message dated 98-06-16 03:34:51 EDT, you write:

<< > Hey davey, if the 44 chassis bite (your claim) but not Urq's, how 'bout
 > experiencing one so that you know what it is.  Then we have a better
baseline
 > of understanding.  Kinda like talking about sex to a virgin...
 
 >Dave and I have felt that way for a long time.
 
> You've never driven a Torsen-equipped ur-quattro, and yet you have the
> gall to tell us it "bites"?
 
 >Sunshine - you're the virgin here. >>

Appreciate the kind words sweetcheeks, but I hardly know you....
>From another arachnoid virgin that's just read about the bite, and never
experienced one, and flat denies it happens.  That would be the definition of
a nun with a bad habbit.  You and Dave can share a room (and you'll like the
Fat Tire Ale on draught) at the Ramada friday and Sat Jan 30-31 '99.

Come play with us at Steamboat fellas.  It's much safer car sex than the
'fondling'  you two have been "trying" to replicate, let's go all the way.
Hope you find the torsen to be everything you claim, cuz many here haven't.

You guys don't have to wear white, it gets so messy with those bite stains....

I personally find any speak of a dumb gear jamming frictional device being
smart, and 'anticipating' all the right things to be the best joke of the
year.  A couple of "smart" believers that haven't experienced ANY bite, just
makes me smile.  Instead of the flame war, how 'bout you guys understand what
it is in a 44 chassis car.  Might help this discussion move forward, and maybe
put the 'device' in perspective.

Given my number of 'affairs' with the 'widow', I'm laughing too, that one
would address me virginally.  Appreciate, as always Phil, your consistent
denial of the dark side of the center torsen phenomenon, so explained by Stan
the Torsen Man, the Zexel thesaurus brothers, Jeff, and myself.  At least
something is consistent in YOUR torsen equipped urq while turning....

Scott Justusson