Re: Bilsteins on a 4kq

[Bob Davis <bob@segNET.COM>]

I'm putting HD's on mine.  The Sports are really designed for lowered cars
(the "sweet spot" is different, and I believe the shaft is shorter).  I had
the Sports on a lowered Scirocco - the thing was like a slot car.  I lived
in VA then, so it wasn't a problem, but I wouldn't want that car up here in
NH.  I believe you'll find the same thing in OR.  

The Bilsteins might raise your car up a bit (just a little though) which is
another reason I am putting them in.  I am using the car primarily as a
winter beater and a TSD rally car, so clearance is an issue (skid plate in
the plan too).

I don't know if replacing the springs will be necessary, but do all of the
bushings (if they need it) and the other usual suspension bits that die.

I like Bilsteins - I've had good luck with the product, and I think the
company is a good one.
They support racing and take care of their customers (IME).


>
>Does anyone have an opinion of the merits of Bilstein HD's vs Sports on
>an 86 4kq?  The car is our carpool daily driver.  I don't know how old
>the current shocks are but they are mushy and bottom out on wimpy
>speedbumps. My records only go back ~75k miles and they bear no mention
>of new shocks or springs.  The back bumper is at least one inch lower
>than a comparable vintage 4kq with new very stiff Boge's.  Bilstein's UK
>and US web sites have no information on the 4kq HD and Sport other than
>P/N.  I want something stiffer, but not terribly stiff, and preferably
>not lower than stock.  We also plan on replacing the springs and all the
>little rubber bits.  I assume the choice of springs depends on the
>choice of shocks.  Opinions on shocks to go with Bilstein's are gladly
>accepted.  Thanks.
>
>Denise Riley
>


Bob Davis
bob@segNET.COM

http://www.segNET.COM