Re: stock 4000Q faster than A4?

[c a l i b a n <caliban@sharon.net>]

	someone posted a while ago about a ford fiesta beating 
	a bunch of porsches on the track.  it's really all 
	about the driver, not as much the car.

On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Jason Palmer wrote:

]So no one bit at your last jab, so you tried harder??
]
]Here's an open invite to run with us in Texas, March 13 and 14.
]
]I can think of 4 A4s right off that will help you reconsider your
]"A4's are slow" theory.
]
]My 'slug' A4 with just a chip upgrade hounded 911 turbos, 996s, 944s,
]M3s, M roadsters, and a Vette at the last event. What does that say
]about car performance vs driver experience?
]
]Yes, a properly tuned 4000sq will run very well (right Luis?), but
]I'll take my 190hp A4 turboq and the 3 year warranty. 
]
]Jason Palmer
]97 A4 1.8Tq mtm, brembos, front bar (about as stock as Carter's car)
]88 GTi (stock as the day it left PA)
]80 MGB (was non-stock before it touched the floor at Abingdon)
]_________________________________________________________
]DO YOU YAHOO!?
]Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
]


--
 rocky mullin
 http://caliban.sf.ca.us/
 two strokes are faster than four!
 this message was composed using the vi editor.
 '83 ur-q - yamaha rz350 - suzuki ts250 -  chaotic good