[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 1995 A6 Timing Belt

To: Jason.Small@valleylab.com (Small, Jason)
Subject: Re: 1995 A6 Timing Belt
From: rjandrew@post.cis.smu.edu (R Justin Andrews)
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 12:48:40 -0600 (CST)
Cc: quattro@coimbra.ans.net
In-Reply-To: <c=US%a=_%p=ussurg%l=VLMAIL-990115211020Z-4265@americas_pdc.ussurg.com> from "Small, Jason" at Jan 15, 99 04:10:20 pm
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

MC's are the turbo motors.... 100's never had a turbo...
you probably have the 2.3 i-5 which is non-interference...

HTH!
Rich Andrews
rjandrew@post.cis.smu.edu
> 
> > There is no real "industry standard"; it depends on the car.
> > I believe the V8s recommend 90K (but wisdom is still 60K).
> > Some engines are interference, some are not. Many Audis
> > (especially the non-interference ones) do not specify a
> > change interval. My new A6 does; 60K.
> 
> Is there a way to find out if an Audi engine is an interference or not?
> (i.e. a compiled web site?)  My specific question is regarding a 1989
> 100Q.  I think its the MC engine, but I don't have my Bentley handy and
> I have a poor memory.
> 
> TIA
> Jason Small
> jason.small@valleylab.com
> 1989 100Q
>

References:
- Re: 1995 A6 Timing Belt
  - From: "Small, Jason" <Jason.Small@valleylab.com>

Prev by Date: RE: 5KCSTQ: Fuel Distributor mistake
Next by Date: seat @#3 in the monte carlo
Prev by thread: Re: 1995 A6 Timing Belt
Next by thread: Early 4k F disc brake splash shields
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread