[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Delrin or poly

To: "Buchholz, Steven" <Steven.Buchholz@kla-tencor.com>
Subject: RE: Delrin or poly
From: Javad Shadzi <javad@ecst.csuchico.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 20:32:56 -0800 (PST)
cc: "'qlist'" <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
In-Reply-To: <933713F1FB7BD111AC2300A0C98F1AD101A07A96@milxpr06.kla-tencor.com>
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net



On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Buchholz, Steven wrote:

> Thanks for the info on the upgrades!  My only question is that doesn't
> stiffening the Panhard rod so that it will not flex make any anti-roll bar
> unnecessary?  It was my understanding that the Panhard rod was serving the
> purposes of an anti-roll bar on the rear suspensions of the older FWD cars
> ...
> 
> Steve Buchholz
> San Jose, CA (USA)

	The anti roll bar and the panhard rod serve two competely
different purposes.  The panhard bar keeps the car centered over the rear
suspension, "locates it".  If there is flex in that, the car will bounce
with lateral loads causing the rear tracking to change.  Something you
dont need to worry about with ind rear quattros...
Javad Shadzi
86 coupe GT

References:
- RE: Delrin or poly
  - From: "Buchholz, Steven" <Steven.Buchholz@kla-tencor.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Girling 60 conversion. Long
Next by Date: Re: CGT Mods
Prev by thread: RE: Delrin or poly
Next by thread: Delrin or Poly
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread