Re: FW: Lets Drop the Drop the Digest Thread.

[Phil and Judy Rose <pjrose@servtech.com>]

>Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 19:11:59 GMT
>From: quk@isham-research.demon.co.uk (Phil Payne)
>Subject: Re: FW: Lets Drop the Drop the Digest Thread.
>
>In message <000301be971a$cf437100$5e4f7018@wlfdle1.on.wave.home.com>
>"Peter Berrevoets" writes:
>
>> The biggest whiner seems to be Phil re: WOB, but I wonder if it's more due
>> to the fact that for him, much of the content is redundant.
>
>I love the way so many jump up and accuse me of whining when all I
>did was ask whether the digest saves bandwidth or actually contributes
>to its wastage.
>
>All the last few posts have done is prove my point - opinions long since
>aired and accepted on the main list are still appearing from digest
>subscribers.
>
>BTW - this _IS_ a democratic list.  One Dan, one vote.
>

Phil,
 I'd say we'd best reserve for Dan the privilege of declaring when a
topic's been "long since aired and accepted". As for the term "the main
list", does Dan call it that? Or is it some kind of British
class-distinction thing slipping in here?

Phil R.

         **********************************************
         *  Phil & Judy Rose           Rochester, NY  *
	 *                       		      *
         *        mailto:pjrose@servtech.com          *
	 **********************************************