Re: Extinction of 200 20vt <was economics of...

[Orin Eman <orin@wolfenet.com>]

> James A. Desveaux decided to speak these words:

> >Finally, they did make incremental
> >improvements on those cars from '89 through '91, including in reliability.
> >I look at it as a poor(er) man's/woman's S4.:)


> Apparently people are mistaking what i said.  Yeah, it is defitely the 
> best as far as sedans go.  But tell me, why put so much effort into 
> making a 4000lb sedan perform?  Its great stock, fantastic even...but 

Because if a 'big' sedan is what you _need_ for your family or whatever,
then you can talk forever about 4ks and UrQs and it means as much
to the 200 owner as the 200 does to you.  It's a pointless argument.

Orin.