poker, or was that snap? (was Pokers - spider ante)

["Dave Eaton" <Dave.Eaton@clear.net.nz>]

scott says on october 4th:

======================
A couple things in reference to your recent threads to date come up in that
very "white paper" Dave.  [snip] Look really hard at the "assumptions" in
the section "Vehicle Behavior when Accelerating in a Turn."  Then reread
that section with the "assumptions" in mind.  Any revelations come about?  I
find it amazing that you would pick a "white" paper to make your stand, that
describes exactly the spider bite phenomenon.  Great show Dave.

======================
and now 1 week later (after much prodding) he says:

Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 20:37:52 EDT
From: QSHIPQ@aol.com
Subject: Re:  Pokers - spider ante

Clarification... I make the claim about a torsen bite without referencing
your 80q v 80q paper.  I don't have the paper, but I do have my notes on it.
Given you quized me for a synopsis of that paper without reference, it's
yours, bro.  I don't need it, I would also argue, neither do you.  But,
happy to discuss when you are ready...  You attempted a blindside and lost,
post up man.  OR, drop it.  I call.

==========================

have you *ever* won at poker scott?

dave
'95 rs2
'90 ur-q
'88 mb 2.3-16