A6 vs URQ performance?

[Dave Eaton]

well, last time i checked i had a fast 4-door q and a fast 2-door q in the
garage.  they are not really comparable, but both are staying put (at least
until my seat time in an rs4).

the s6 (not sure whether/when this will be available in the usa) doesn't do
it for me.  too big/heavy, with "brute force" handling, love the grunt
though - lovely motor.

agree with the sentiment about the older ur-q's though and, certainly
down-under, the market agrees also...

dave
'95 rs2
'90 ur-q
-----Original Message-----
From: QSHIPQ at aol.com
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:10:48 EST
Subject: Re: [urq] A6 vs URQ performance?
To: urq at audifans.com, quattro at audifans.com

--
I'm with Steve on this one. The urq is a fine Classic GT, but hardly the
"practical" quattro, especially with a growing family (steve), baby seats
into a 2 door is no fun.  Having had seat time in both, the relevence is in
the new vs the classic quattro.  Or as one that also has the quattro 4door
(8744tqw), I personally enjoy them for different reasons, but both adorn the
garage (double vision in the case of the urq).  Fast 4door sedans and wagons
need no excuses to the quattro officianado.  I'm kinda surprised, Mr. RS2
dude, you don't agree.