[s-cars] RE: Stebro

[TM]

Matt-
Show me proof that an IRS-equipped SVT Cobra cannot lap a road
course faster than most Audis. No way is a stock UrS coming anywhere
close to the Cobra's performance.

Just look at the Solo II results of the Mustangs versus nearly any of
the Audis- the only Audis that come close are the TT 180 FWD, the
TT 225q and the S4tt.

Recent car magazine tests of the supercharged '03+ SVT Cobra indicate
that its performance is on par with a LS1 Corvette C5, but not in the
league of the LS6 Z06.

I'd also consider a Camaro SS, but the Camaro is definitely too pricey
to insure. Same thing with the Corvette- insurance too high, car too
expensive, otherwise I'd get a C5.

Taka

-----Original Message-----
From: s-car-list-bounces at audifans.com
[mailto:s-car-list-bounces at audifans.com] On Behalf Of matt ludwig
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 2:24 PM
To: //Scar //Scar list
Subject: Re: [s-cars] RE: Stebro



On May 14, 2004, at 2:15 PM, TM wrote:

> '01 SVT Cobra is looking good right now- I can easily get 350whp with
> bolt-ons and the car still handles much better than the Audi.


Are you serious? I have been in many "ferds" and w/ that- plenty of 
mustangs. they do not even come close to the handling of an Audi in my 
opinion. even a stock, UrS is in much better position to out perform 
any "stock" mustang- add any sort of weather in with that and well. . . 
.

i have seen far to many rear-wheel drive "Amurican" cars on the side of 
the road when the weather gets even mild to seriously consider this. 
Taka, where are you coming from on this position? Is there some 
performance data or reviews that have missed me in the last 5 years or 
something?

sincerely,

matt ludwig.
1995.5 s6 avant.

_______________________________________________
S-CAR-List mailing list
S-CAR-List at audifans.com
http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list