[s-cars] RE: Stebro
Theodore Chen
tedebearp at yahoo.com
Fri May 14 17:16:30 EDT 2004
--- matt ludwig <matt.ludwig2 at verizon.net> wrote:
> i should clarify here real quick-
>
> i did not mean to question Taka's statement on the power potentials at
> all. fully agree the 4.6L is more than capable of some SERIOUS power
> w/o any internals being beefed up- this is also actually one of my
> points to why i question the latter half of the statement.
my comment was just responding to taka's. actually, 400 rwhp for a
supercharged DOHC 4.6 is on the conservative side. i know people who
have made well over 500 rwhp, street legal in CA even.
> w/ that, yes
> i was referring to the "later" versions of the 'stang. i agree, they
> are a simple platform and there is something to be said for that
> simplistic, raw platform and trying to obtain a real monster from that.
> i can't though even begin to really consider that this platform can out
> "handle", in any condition, the very nature of the beast we all have
> learned to love that is audi and the quattro system.
you have to define "handle". dry performance on smooth roads, performance
on icy/snowy roads, or off-roading ability?
taka already has an audi. he's looking for something different.
let's face it - as much as we love our UrS cars, they don't handle all
that well. mine is a '92 with the stiffest stock suspension and a
rear antiroll bar, and it's a 4000 lb. understeering pig. one of its
biggest problems is the triangulated front antiroll bar, which guarantees
steering weirdness and understeer no matter what you do. i bought the car
as a fast, comfortable street car, and it excels in that role. but it is
not a particularly good-handling car when pressed hard.
> serious, serious money has to be anted up ( as alex and teddy both
> point out) to be abel to compensate for a far less than acceptable
> chassis set up and be able to compete w/ a "stock" Urs.
no, i said "cheap". we are talking about things like shocks, springs,
camber plates. the '99+ mustangs are better than the earlier years in
that regard.
> my question still stands though, what about your '87 mustang in
> stock form? will it still drive circles around your stock S4, teddy?
i don't know. it's been so long since it was stock that i can't remember
what it was like. however, any '99+ mustang will. they have better
suspension geometry, wider track, more power, and the ability to put
really big tires on them.
to pick up ford's tagline: have you driven a mustang... lately?
-teddy
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.
http://promo.yahoo.com/sbc/
More information about the S-CAR-List
mailing list