[urq] Piggy back wastgates?
James Bufkin
jbufkin at austin.rr.com
Sun Jan 16 10:35:32 EST 2005
Justin,
I'm not an expert on this system, but I've made inquiries to a few people
about how it works and I'll relay as much information as possible here.
I don't have the 2nd wastegate hooked up to anything at the moment. The
exhaust manifold is vented into the piggybacked manifold so the manifold is
fully functionaly, but I have installed a solid copper gasket at the 2nd
wastegate as a cap. I left the 2nd manifold on there to hold the copper
cap in place. I have seen other Audisport retrofit installs with a steel
plate bolted to this orifice to dubunk the system. The bottom of the 2nd
wastegate would connect to the U-pipe between the turbo and intercooler.
Basically the system allows intake charge air to enter the exhaust stream
via the wastegate. Its controlled by vacuum pressure post TB with some
other electronic vacuum control not yet determined. The wastegate will be
open at idle introducing O2 in to the exhaust stream which results in a
very marked increase in turbo RPMs which means more CFM airflow. To
prevent turbo surge the unused air is vented into the manifold which
provides O2 gases for post combustion or a rich mix. So for example the
turbo is always providing some very high CFM number. The wastegate merely
dumps whatever air the engine can't consume into the hotside. The
complicated part is controlling the balance between the exhaust manifold
pressure and the intake manifold pressure to keep flow going in the right
direction.
Described by Bruno, A car so equiped would idle at about 4000 rpms. Boost
pressure is instant and power is fantastic with NO lag at all at any
RPM. The problems encountered is that the system burns up exhaust valves
and exhaust manifolds rapidly. Bruno said within an hour. So, the system
isn't normally seen on any S1s anymore. And more often than not a close
examination of most S1 E2s with the tubular Lehmann manifold will have the
2nd wastegate removed or the piggyback manifold removed.
The two turbos I got with the manifold had #9 K27 hotsides. Interestingly
enough, I saw a picture of a #9 K27 hotside used on the Safari rally of
1982. This stamping number on the turbo was visible and this was on a 10V
car which supposedly had less lag than the 20V cars. The #7 was used on
the SQ which is what is on my car now. Lehmann thinks the #9 is good for
racing and the #7 is too small unless I want to drive like an old
man. LOL What is interesting about all this, is the choice of hotside
size that was used on the various cars. I think the #9 on a 10V is very
large; however, the picture clearly shows that this turbo was used on
10Vs. Its possible they used a larger hotside on the final version of the
system to reduce exhaust temps. And since they used #9s on 10V cars(via
the picture) they might have gone even larger on the S1s which might not
have been the right thing to do. I haven't driven my car with a #9 turbo
so I can't compare, but I do like the lag characteristics of the K27 #7
very much. Its not bad at all.
Could the system be made to work without destroying valves? Possibly. I
havent given it alot of thought recently. I'm happy with the turbo on the
car and its lag characterisitics. According to a few SQ owners they get
full boost around 4K and thats about where I'm at with my setup. The RS2
with the #6 was making boost by 3500 rpm or so. Very decent. Lehmann
says the #9 is about 500 rpm later so I would expect around 4500 rpm. The
#11s and #13s which might have been used on the 20V rally cars would push
that to 5K or higher which would validate the complaints the drivers made
on the lag characteristics when the power got that high. However, this
anti-lag system could possibly work to remedy that if a large hotside is
used to control temps and pressures.
I bought the stuff from Ned Ritchie. The manifold holes had been plugged
and the piggyback was detached. The wastegates were functional. The
manifold itself had numerous hairline cracks and was slightly warped on
most flanges. It had been repaired in the past already. Surely a sign of
very high heat and possibly dabilatating the manifold for good. I took it
to a master welder and machinist who also legally rebuilds deactivated
class3 MGs so he knows his way around welding shit back together. I milled
over the idea of ditching this manifold completely in lieu of a tubular
manifold from Sam Yeo's car now owned by Fru-T-pants. In the end, I
decided to at least attempt to repair the manifold and put it back together
like it was supposed to be. Over the course of a day he was able to slowly
weld up the cracks with some very fine and long pencil TIG attachments. We
were also jetting argon on the inside of the manifold. We tried not to
use filler rod, cause the metallurgy on the manifold was definately an
exotic alloy. I had the surfaces decked and so far it looks okay but I
haven't stressed it too much. I want to complete the brace down to the
motor mount before I go much further. The two turbos are dated 6-5-85 and
are 3 and 4 from a run of 15. They were K27 #9 hotsides with a 3450
compressor wheel in a K29 housing. If I recall, a mechanic who worked on
the 85 pike's peak car got these damaged parts as partial payment. They
were used on test runs up the hill. I think Ned got them via barter for
his services as well.
Sorry for the length of this blurb.
James
More information about the urq
mailing list