[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: S4 20v vs S2 10v
- To: quattro@swiss.ans.net (Non Receipt Notification Requested) (IPM Return Requested)
- Subject: Re: S4 20v vs S2 10v
- From: glen.powell@smc.com
- Date: 08 Feb 1995 08:10:30 -0500
- Autoforwarded: FALSE
- Importance: normal
- Message-Type: Multiple part
- P1-Content-Type: P2
- P1-Message-Id: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLAN;X400ATT Feb 08 08:10:30 1995
- P1-Recipient: quattro@swiss.ans.net
- Priority: normal
- Reply-To: quattro
- Sender: quattro-owner
- Ua-Content-Id: 301008080295
- X400-Trace: US*ATTMAIL*SMCLANarrival 08 Feb 1995 08:10:30 -0500action Relayed
--------------------------- Begin X.400 Bodypart 1 --------------------------
========== On Wed, 8 Feb 1995 - quattro-owner wrote: ==========
--------------------------- Begin X.400 Bodypart 2 --------------------------
On Tue, 7 Feb 1995, Eliot Lim wrote:
> i stand corrected. so, the high compression would be good for off-boost
> response (claims audi) and also higher efficiency (better fuel mileage).
> any other advantages? seems to me that a lower CR is better for
> high boost and high outputs. is that correct?
A lower CR would be better for "off boost" performance, meaning the time
before the turbo spools up. A few cars lately have been running *very*
YOU MEANT A *HIGHER* CR IS BETTER "OFF BOOST", RIGHT?
- -glen
--So many variables...so little time...
---Bob
----------------------------- End X.400 Bodyparts ----------------------------