RE: A4 "Better" than an M3 for 6K?

[Paul Caneiro <PCaneiro@squareone.com>]

Bob,

Since your Boss 302 Stang (Nice car) is obviously worked - I would
definitely give it a go under one condition - we stage a re-match when I
get the car back from the tuner in Jan- Feb.  I am still undecided who
to use.  Ruf or CEC. (feedback welcome)

Anyway I am looking for about 750 to 800hp and an equally outrageous
amount of torque

So  - do we race???  :-)

As for the M3 - the car had a tendency to be light in the front during
wet weather  - very unnerving -even at slow speeds - 60 mph

Paul


>----------
>From: 	Bob D'Amato[SMTP:mx@snet.com]
>Sent: 	Tuesday, September 17, 1996 8:19 PM
>To: 	Paul Caneiro
>Cc: 	'The Judge'; 'Robert Myers'; 'quattro@coimbra.ans.net'
>Subject: 	RE: A4 "Better" than an M3 for 6K?
>
>On Tue, 17 Sep 1996, Paul Caneiro wrote:
>
>> Ass the owner of both a 96 A4Q and a 96 911 Turbo, I can tell you that
>> the Porsche can and does beat everything off the line  - wet or dry!!!
>
>As the owner of a very hot Boss 302, Ill take you up on that statement! 
>(Ok, only up to about 125 mph) :)
>
>> 
>> 
>> I had a 1995 M3 and I was very disapointed with the car in any weather
>> but the driest days.  I was glad when the car was stolen from my office
>> parking lot.
>> 
>
>That seem to be the general consensus about the M3. A friend of mine has 
>one, its alredy for sale...(4 months old)(Bought an s6)
>
>Bob
>
>
>
>
>_____________________________________________________________________
>bob.damato@snet.com   http://204.60.3.2./audi/audi.html (Temporarily Down!!!)
>	              http://home.earthlink.net/~willyt/deltat.html	
>                                                 
>               Drive Safe, Drive Fast, Drive a Quattro
>
>