[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: 4*0=0 or Another Ur-q bites the dust

To: Michael Williams <daserde@ucla.edu>
Subject: Re: 4*0=0 or Another Ur-q bites the dust
From: shields@tembel.org (Michael Shields)
Date: 12 Jun 1998 02:42:30 +0000
Cc: "Ian J Haseltine" <jim_haseltine@email.msn.com>, "Quattro List" <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
In-Reply-To: Michael Williams's message of "Tue, 9 Jun 98 17:46:17 -0700"
Mail-Copies-To: never
References: <199806100044.RAA28696@theta2.ben2.ucla.edu>
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

In article <199806100044.RAA28696@theta2.ben2.ucla.edu>,
Michael Williams <daserde@ucla.edu> wrote:
> This just seems to be yet another example of just how safe these cars 
> are.  I hit the guard rail at about 50 mph, and given that it was at a 20 
> degree angle, there is NO frame damage, and that is just on a 4kQ.

That was not a fluke -- I did the same thing.
-- 
Shields.
['86 Coupe GT]

References:
- Re: 4*0=0 or Another Ur-q bites the dust
  - From: Michael Williams <daserde@ucla.edu>

Prev by Author: Re: how do you make the a/c colder?
Next by Author: Re: Spark Plug gap (kinda' long)
Prev by thread: Re: 4*0=0 or Another Ur-q bites the dust
Next by thread: RE: 4*0=0 or Another Ur-q bites the dust
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread