[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: 5K timing belt

To: MSV96@aol.com, quattro@coimbra.ans.net
Subject: Re: 5K timing belt
From: Wallace White <wallace@remdesign.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 1998 14:39:53 -0800
Organization: REM Design
References: <3187a7fe.365c4368@aol.com> <365C6E51.71AE15D0@remdesign.com>
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

Wallace White wrote:
> If indeed the 2.2l NA I5 is non-interference, I would think (but
> wouldn't know for sure!) that the 2.2l turbo I5 10v (MC) would certainly
> be an interference design, because of the lower compression ratio.

Whoops, that's not what I meant to say. I was trying to say that the MC
would be non-interference. Anyway, I was wrong, since it sounds like
Marty and others have had one interfere. Thanks.

- Wallace
  '87 5kcstq 151k

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 5K timing belt
  - From: Bob <mx@snet.net>

References:
- Re: 5K timing belt
  - From: MSV96@aol.com
- Re: 5K timing belt
  - From: Wallace White <wallace@remdesign.com>

Prev by Author: Re: Sport quattros
Next by Author: Re: Wiper Blades
Prev by thread: Re: 5K timing belt
Next by thread: Re: 5K timing belt
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread