RE: Wasted BW

["Dupree, Jim" <dupree@alldata.com>]

I often find the sig's useful and I don't mine the waste of BW. But then
again I don't pay for any of my BW either. I am subscribed at work and
Outlook sorts the qlist mail in to a separate folder as it comes in. I
latter sort by and scan the subject line and read the threads that seem
interesting to me. I don't really think the sig line is a big enough piece
of data to be a big problem to those that pay by the byte. Including the
original message in your response uses more BW than a big sig does. Images,
now they eat up the BW.
Jim Dupree

		-----Original Message-----
		From:	Bernard Littau
[mailto:bernardl@acumenassociates.com]
		Sent:	Friday, April 23, 1999 10:58 AM
		To:	Aaron Chadwick; quattro@audifans.com
		Subject:	Re: Wasted BW

		From: Aaron Chadwick <AaronC@bellevueclub.com>

		>As a gesture to those that pay by the byte for access,
would listers
		>consider limiting their AutoSignature's?  I don't need to
know about all
		>the mods and past Audis that everyone in your family tree
has owned.  I
		>don't pay, but some do.  I get tired of wading through
redundancy.


		I find it very useful to know where people are located (hint
hint).  The
		type of
		Audi(s) they own is also more often useful than not.

		Best,

		Bernard Littau
		Woodinville, WA
		'88 5kcstq