Re: Extinction 200t20v WAS -> economics of 20v wrecking

[Michael Williams <urquattro@surfree.com>]

JShadzi@aol.com decided to speak these words:

>	This is a fact, and a reality that you should learn to accept and 
>deal with.  Its called creativity, there are plenty of really nice cars to 
>tink with in the future.  I dont understand, it sound like some of you would 
>like to pass legislation preventing the further demise of another 200 20v.  
>Frankly, I think the 20v is a much better motor in the lighter cars, and 
>something Audi should have provided in the first place.  Sure, it might be a 
>shame, but what are you going to do?  You have no right telling anyone what 
>they should do with their car...just trying to make sense of your rant.


Amen, i was actually thining the same thing.  What is it that makes the 
91 200tq so special?  Its the engine.  The chassis, well, its OK, but 
thats about it.  It is huge, heavy, and not all that stiff.  Put it in a 
4kq, like the race team im on did, and it will blow any 200 out of the 
water.

Im sorry guys, as nice as the 200tq is, its only the engine that makes it 
so great....

later...

Michael Sheridan Williams
San Francisco, CA
ICQ# 11740998
1983 UrQuattro, MC--1.8 BAR, borla, 16x7.5 OZ Mito's w/ SP8000's, K&N
1985 4000S Quattro, Koni Yellows/Coilover (2B), strut brace, Sport 8000 
Tires, K&N
http://members.aol.com/daserde2