Re: Removeable transoms

["Ken Keith" <auditude@neta.com>]

quk@isham-research.demon.co.uk (Phil Payne) wrote:
> 
> Yup, it's what you guys call a 'core support' - though it's perhaps
> not quite as big a removeable section.
> 
> It brings me back to the key point for those putting MC engines in
> ur-quattros - Audi already did it (the MB ur-quattro in 1988/9) so
> why re-invent the wheel?  Just check out the parts listings for the
> MB.  You don't need 'custom' versions of _ANYTHING_.

Good point.  I like that idea.

Now I'm wondering how stock you can get a 4kstq to be, using factory 
MB ur-q parts.

How different are the 4ksq's from the ur-q's in the relevant area 
(underhood)?  I know the battery is in a different place, and the tie rod is 
different, but what else?

Thanks,

Ken