[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 5ktq front track vs V8/91'200

To: quattro list <quattro@audifans.com>
Subject: Re: 5ktq front track vs V8/91'200
From: Todd Phenneger <phen9461@uidaho.edu>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 02:27:25 -0800 (PST)
cc: Adam Dieckerhoff <fourquattros@hotmail.com>, Daniel Hussey <dan_hussey@email.msn.com>, "Romeo Shayne Pavlic'" <bcpi@arias.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GHP.4.21.9912080140030.29093-100000@raptor.csrv.uidaho.edu>
Sender: owner-quattro@audifans.com

quick change to my above post.  Actually the V8 has a track of 59.6 inches
not he 57.1 that I mentioned earlier.  Maybe that misinformation is the
track of the 5ktq???  If so thats a BIG difference but the ur-q has a 57
something inch track so I would think the 5ktq was bigger.  
	anyhow, sorry for the incorrect first post.
Thanks


	Todd Phenneger
	1983 ur-q / black / getting a MC
	1984 4000 Turbo quattro (Faster than your average 4kq)
	1987 4000 quattro / Saphire Metallic Blue/ Girlfriend's
	1996 A6q / Volcano / Dads Car
   *****1985 5kt / PARTING OUT!
  *	http://www.uidaho.edu/~phen9461/motorsports.htm

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 5ktq front track vs V8/91'200 (update)
  - From: Todd Phenneger <phen9461@uidaho.edu>

Prev by Date: Ball housing R+R
Next by Date: Re: Type 44 Single Pass Intercoolers in US? Mac-07 ECU
Prev by thread: Re: Ball housing R+R
Next by thread: Re: 5ktq front track vs V8/91'200 (update)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread