[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Interference or not - V6?

To: Keleigh Hardie <hobbesian@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: Interference or not - V6?
From: Steve Valin <steve@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 09:31:04 -0700
CC: Steve Valin <steve@sgi.com>, Quattro List <quattro@coimbra.ans.net>
References: <19970620034745.AAA2664@hobbesian>
Sender: owner-quattro@coimbra.ans.net

Keleigh Hardie wrote:
> 
> Sure about which?

I was refering to the V6.

> About the V6, absolutely. Most of the one's I've seen
> that have thrown the belt have bent valves.

I had misunderstood your original post.  I got my double negatives
confused.  I agree, the V6 is not a non-interference engine!

-steve

--
Steve Valin	http://reality.sgi.com/steve_engr	steve@sgi.com
    		"Time wounds all heels"  -Crackerbash

References:
- Re: Interference or not - V6?
  - From: "Keleigh Hardie" <hobbesian@worldnet.att.net>

Prev by Author: Re: Interference or not - V6?
Next by Author: 20V CQ for those not scared off by hi miles:
Prev by thread: Re: Interference or not - V6?
Next by thread: Re: Spring Compressors
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread